What Percentage of Babies Actually Will Need Infant Cpr

The following guidelines are an interpretation of the show presented in the 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations ¹). They use primarily to newly built-in infants undergoing transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life, but the recommendations are also applicable to neonates who have completed perinatal transition and require resuscitation during the outset few weeks to months post-obit nativity. Practitioners who resuscitate infants at birth or at any time during the initial hospital access should consider post-obit these guidelines. For the purposes of these guidelines, the terms newborn and neonate are intended to utilise to whatsoever babe during the initial hospitalization. The term newly built-in is intended to apply specifically to an infant at the time of birth.

Approximately 10% of newborns crave some assistance to begin breathing at birth. Less than ane% crave extensive resuscitative measures.^ii,iii Although the vast majority of newly born infants do non require intervention to make the transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life, because of the large total number of births, a sizable number will crave some degree of resuscitation.

Those newly built-in infants who do not require resuscitation tin can by and large be identified by a rapid cess of the post-obit 3 characteristics:

Term gestation?
Crying or breathing?
Good musculus tone?

If the respond to all 3 of these questions is "yes," the baby does not need resuscitation and should not exist separated from the mother. The baby should be dried, placed skin-to-peel with the mother, and covered with dry linen to maintain temperature. Observation of animate, activity, and color should be ongoing.

If the answer to any of these assessment questions is "no," the babe should receive one or more of the post-obit 4 categories of action in sequence:

Initial steps in stabilization (provide warmth, clear airway if necessary, dry, stimulate)
Ventilation
Breast compressions
Administration of epinephrine and/or volume expansion

Approximately 60 seconds ("the Gilt Minute") are allotted for completing the initial steps, reevaluating, and beginning ventilation if required (run across Figure). The conclusion to progress beyond the initial steps is determined past simultaneous cess of 2 vital characteristics: respirations (apnea, gasping, or labored or unlabored breathing) and centre charge per unit (whether greater than or less than 100 beats per minute). Assessment of heart rate should be done past intermittently auscultating the precordial pulse. When a pulse is detectable, palpation of the umbilical pulse tin can also provide a rapid estimate of the pulse and is more authentic than palpation at other sites.^4,5

**Figure.** Newborn Resuscitation Algorithm.

A pulse oximeter can provide a continuous assessment of the pulse without intermission of other resuscitation measures, simply the device takes 1 to 2 minutes to apply, and it may not function during states of very poor cardiac output or perfusion. Once positive pressure ventilation or supplementary oxygen administration is begun, cess should consist of simultaneous evaluation of 3 vital characteristics: heart charge per unit, respirations, and the state of oxygenation, the latter optimally determined by a pulse oximeter equally discussed nether "Assessment of Oxygen Need and Administration of Oxygen" below. The most sensitive indicator of a successful response to each footstep is an increase in middle rate.

Anticipation of Resuscitation Demand

Anticipation, adequate training, accurate evaluation, and prompt initiation of support are critical for successful neonatal resuscitation. At every commitment there should be at least ane person whose primary responsibility is the newly born. This person must be capable of initiating resuscitation, including assistants of positive-pressure level ventilation and breast compressions. Either that person or someone else who is promptly available should have the skills required to perform a complete resuscitation, including endotracheal intubation and assistants of medications.^six Several studies have demonstrated that a cesarean department performed under regional anesthesia at 37 to 39 weeks, without antenatally identified adventure factors, versus a similar vaginal commitment performed at term, does non increase the risk of the infant requiring endotracheal intubation.^7–10

With conscientious consideration of risk factors, the majority of newborns who volition need resuscitation tin be identified before nascence. If the possible need for resuscitation is predictable, boosted skilled personnel should be recruited and the necessary equipment prepared. Identifiable risk factors and the necessary equipment for resuscitation are listed in the Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, 6th Edition (American Academy of Pediatrics, in press).¹¹ If a preterm commitment (<37 weeks of gestation) is expected, special preparations will exist required. Preterm babies have immature lungs that may be more than difficult to ventilate and are also more than vulnerable to injury by positive-force per unit area ventilation. Preterm babies too have immature blood vessels in the brain that are decumbent to hemorrhage; thin skin and a large surface area, which contribute to rapid heat loss; increased susceptibility to infection; and increased chance of hypovolemic shock related to small blood volume.

Initial Steps

The initial steps of resuscitation are to provide warmth by placing the infant under a radiant oestrus source, positioning the caput in a "sniffing" position to open the airway, clearing the airway if necessary with a seedling syringe or suction catheter, drying the babe, and stimulating breathing. Recent studies accept examined several aspects of these initial steps. These studies are summarized beneath.

Temperature Control

Very low-birth-weight (<1500 yard) preterm babies are likely to become hypothermic despite the use of traditional techniques for decreasing heat loss.¹² For this reason additional warming techniques are recommended (eg, prewarming the delivery room to 26°C,¹³ covering the infant in plastic wrapping (food or medical grade, heat-resistant plastic) (Grade I, LOE A^14,15), placing the baby on an exothermic mattress (Class IIb, LOE B¹⁶), and placing the babe under radiant oestrus (Class IIb, LOE C¹⁷). The infant's temperature must exist monitored closely because of the slight, but described risk of hyperthermia when these techniques are used in combination (Class IIb, LOE B¹⁶). Other techniques for maintaining temperature during stabilization of the babe in the delivery room have been used (eg, prewarming the linen, drying and swaddling, placing the babe skin-to-skin with the mother and covering both with a blanket) and are recommended, but they have not been studied specifically (Grade IIb, LOE C). All resuscitation procedures, including endotracheal intubation, breast compression, and insertion of intravenous lines, can be performed with these temperature-controlling interventions in place (Class IIb, LOE C).

Infants born to febrile mothers have been reported to have a college incidence of perinatal respiratory depression, neonatal seizures, and cognitive palsy and an increased adventure of bloodshed.^18,xix Animal studies indicate that hyperthermia during or afterwards ischemia is associated with progression of cerebral injury. Lowering the temperature reduces neuronal damage.²⁰ Hyperthermia should be avoided (Form IIb, LOE C). The goal is to achieve normothermia and avoid iatrogenic hyperthermia.

Clearing the Airway

When Amniotic Fluid Is Clear

There is evidence that suctioning of the nasopharynx tin can create bradycardia during resuscitation^21,22 and that suctioning of the trachea in intubated babies receiving mechanical ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit of measurement (NICU) can exist associated with deterioration of pulmonary compliance and oxygenation and reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity when performed routinely (ie, in the absenteeism of obvious nasal or oral secretions).^23,24 Nevertheless, there is besides show that suctioning in the presence of secretions can decrease respiratory resistance.²⁵ Therefore it is recommended that suctioning immediately following birth (including suctioning with a bulb syringe) should be reserved for babies who have obvious obstruction to spontaneous breathing or who require positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) (Form IIb, LOE C).

When Meconium is Present

Aspiration of meconium before delivery, during birth, or during resuscitation can crusade astringent meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Historically a multifariousness of techniques have been recommended to reduce the incidence of MAS. Suctioning of the oropharynx before commitment of the shoulders was considered routine until a randomized controlled trial demonstrated it to be of no value.²⁶ Elective and routine endotracheal intubation and direct suctioning of the trachea were initially recommended for all meconium-stained newborns until a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that there was no value in performing this process in babies who were vigorous at birth.²⁷ Although depressed infants built-in to mothers with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) are at increased chance to develop MAS,^28,29 tracheal suctioning has non been associated with reduction in the incidence of MAS or bloodshed in these infants.^xxx,31 The only evidence that straight tracheal suctioning of meconium may be of value was based on comparison of suctioned babies with historic controls, and at that place was apparent selection bias in the grouping of intubated babies included in those studies.^32–34

In the absence of randomized, controlled trials, at that place is bereft evidence to recommend a change in the electric current practice of performing endotracheal suctioning of nonvigorous babies with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (Class IIb, LOE C). However, if attempted intubation is prolonged and unsuccessful, bag-mask ventilation should be considered, particularly if there is persistent bradycardia.

Assessment of Oxygen Need and Administration of Oxygen

There is a big body of evidence that blood oxygen levels in uncompromised babies mostly practice not achieve extrauterine values until approximately x minutes post-obit birth. Oxyhemoglobin saturation may commonly remain in the 70% to 80% range for several minutes post-obit birth, thus resulting in the appearance of cyanosis during that fourth dimension. Other studies have shown that clinical assessment of skin colour is a very poor indicator of oxyhemoglobin saturation during the immediate neonatal period and that lack of cyanosis appears to be a very poor indicator of the country of oxygenation of an uncompromised baby post-obit birth.

Optimal management of oxygen during neonatal resuscitation becomes especially of import considering of the prove that either insufficient or excessive oxygenation tin can exist harmful to the newborn infant. Hypoxia and ischemia are known to issue in injury to multiple organs. Conversely there is growing experimental evidence, as well as evidence from studies of babies receiving resuscitation, that agin outcomes may consequence from even brief exposure to excessive oxygen during and post-obit resuscitation.

Pulse Oximetry

Numerous studies accept divers the percentiles of oxygen saturation as a function of time from birth in uncompromised babies born at term (see table in Figure). This includes saturations measured from both preductal and postductal sites, following both operative and vaginal deliveries, and those occurring at sea level and at altitude.^35–xl

Newer pulse oximeters, which use probes designed specifically for neonates, have been shown to provide reliable readings within i to ii minutes following birth.^41–43 These oximeters are reliable in the big majority of newborns, both term and preterm, and requiring resuscitation or non, equally long equally there is sufficient cardiac output and pare blood flow for the oximeter to detect a pulse. Information technology is recommended that oximetry be used when resuscitation can be predictable,² when positive pressure is administered for more than than a few breaths, when cyanosis is persistent, or when supplementary oxygen is administered (Class I, LOE B).

To appropriately compare oxygen saturations to like published data, the probe should exist attached to a preductal location (ie, the right upper extremity, usually the wrist or medial surface of the palm).⁴³ There is some prove that attaching the probe to the baby before connecting the probe to the instrument facilitates the virtually rapid acquisition of bespeak (Class IIb, LOE C).⁴²

Administration of Supplementary Oxygen

Ii meta-analyses of several randomized controlled trials comparing neonatal resuscitation initiated with room air versus 100% oxygen showed increased survival when resuscitation was initiated with air.^44,45 There are no studies in term infants comparing outcomes when resuscitations are initiated with dissimilar concentrations of oxygen other than 100% or room air. One study in preterm infants showed that initiation of resuscitation with a blend of oxygen and air resulted in less hypoxemia or hyperoxemia, as defined by the investigators, than when resuscitation was initiated with either air or 100% oxygen followed past titration with an adaptable blend of air and oxygen.⁴⁶

In the absence of studies comparing outcomes of neonatal resuscitation initiated with other oxygen concentrations or targeted at various oxyhemoglobin saturations, it is recommended that the goal in babies existence resuscitated at birth, whether born at term or preterm, should be an oxygen saturation value in the interquartile range of preductal saturations (encounter table in Figure) measured in healthy term babies following vaginal birth at sea level (Grade IIb, LOE B). These targets may be accomplished by initiating resuscitation with air or a blended oxygen and titrating the oxygen concentration to achieve an Spo ₂ in the target range as described above using pulse oximetry (Course IIb, LOE C). If blended oxygen is not bachelor, resuscitation should be initiated with air (Grade IIb, LOE B). If the baby is bradycardic (HR <60 per minute) subsequently 90 seconds of resuscitation with a lower concentration of oxygen, oxygen concentration should be increased to 100% until recovery of a normal heart charge per unit (Class IIb, LOE B).

Positive-Pressure level Ventilation (PPV)

If the infant remains apneic or gasping, or if the centre rate remains <100 per infinitesimal later administering the initial steps, start PPV.

Initial Breaths and Assisted Ventilation

Initial inflations following birth, either spontaneous or assisted, create a functional residuum capacity (FRC).^47–50 The optimal pressure, inflation time, and menstruum rate required to establish an effective FRC when PPV is administered during resuscitation accept not been determined. Evidence from animal studies indicates that preterm lungs are hands injured past large-volume inflations immediately after nascence.^51,52 Assisted ventilation rates of 40 to lx breaths per infinitesimal are commonly used, but the relative efficacy of various rates has not been investigated.

The primary mensurate of adequate initial ventilation is prompt improvement in heart charge per unit.⁵³ Chest wall movement should be assessed if heart charge per unit does not improve. The initial top inflating pressures needed are variable and unpredictable and should be individualized to achieve an increase in heart rate or movement of the chest with each breath. Aggrandizement pressure level should be monitored; an initial inflation pressure level of xx cm H_iiO may be constructive, merely ≥thirty to 40 cm H₂O may be required in some term babies without spontaneous ventilation (Form IIb, LOE C).^48,50,54 If circumstances forestall the use of pressure monitoring, the minimal inflation required to achieve an increase in heart rate should exist used. At that place is insufficient bear witness to recommend an optimum aggrandizement time. In summary, assisted ventilation should be delivered at a rate of 40 to threescore breaths per minute to promptly achieve or maintain a heart rate >100 per minute (Class IIb, LOE C).

The use of colorimetric CO₂ detectors during mask ventilation of pocket-sized numbers of preterm infants in the intensive care unit and in the commitment room has been reported, and such detectors may help to identify airway obstacle.^55,56 Withal, information technology is unclear whether the apply of CO₂ detectors during mask ventilation confers additional benefit higher up clinical assessment alone (Class IIb, LOE C).

Terminate-Expiratory Pressure

Many experts recommend administration of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to infants who are breathing spontaneously, but with difficulty, following birth, although its use has been studied only in infants built-in preterm. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of newborns at 25 to 28 weeks gestation with signs of respiratory distress showed no significant difference in the outcomes of decease or oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual historic period between infants started on CPAP versus those intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation in the commitment room. Starting infants on CPAP reduced the rates of intubation and mechanical ventilation, surfactant utilise, and duration of ventilation, but increased the charge per unit of pneumothorax.⁵⁷ Spontaneously animate preterm infants who have respiratory distress may be supported with CPAP or with intubation and mechanical ventilation (Grade IIb, LOE B). The about appropriate selection may be guided by local expertise and preferences. At that place is no evidence to support or refute the use of CPAP in the delivery room in the term baby with respiratory distress.

Although positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been shown to be beneficial and its use is routine during mechanical ventilation of neonates in intensive intendance units, there take been no studies specifically examining PEEP versus no PEEP when PPV is used during establishment of an FRC post-obit birth. Withal, PEEP is likely to exist beneficial and should be used if suitable equipment is bachelor (Course IIb, LOE C). PEEP tin can easily be given with a flow-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator, but it cannot be given with a cocky-inflating bag unless an optional PEEP valve is used. There is, however, some evidence that such valves oft evangelize inconsistent end-expiratory pressures.^58,59

Assisted-Ventilation Devices

Effective ventilation can be achieved with either a flow-inflating or self-inflating bag or with a T-piece mechanical device designed to regulate pressure.^60–63 The popular-off valves of self-inflating bags are dependent on the flow charge per unit of incoming gas, and pressures generated may exceed the value specified past the manufacturer. Target inflation pressures and long inspiratory times are more consistently achieved in mechanical models when T-piece devices are used rather than bags,^60,61 although the clinical implications of these findings are not articulate (Class IIb, LOE C). It is probable that inflation pressures will need to modify as compliance improves following birth, merely the human relationship of pressures to delivered book and the optimal book to deliver with each jiff equally FRC is beingness established have not been studied. Resuscitators are insensitive to changes in lung compliance, regardless of the device being used (Class IIb, LOE C).⁶⁴

Laryngeal Mask Airways

Laryngeal mask airways that fit over the laryngeal inlet have been shown to be effective for ventilating newborns weighing more than 2000 one thousand or delivered ≥34 weeks gestation (Class IIb, LOE B^65–67). At that place are limited information on the use of these devices in minor preterm infants, ie, < 2000 g or <34 weeks (Class IIb, LOE C^65–67). A laryngeal mask should be considered during resuscitation if facemask ventilation is unsuccessful and tracheal intubation is unsuccessful or not feasible (Class IIa, LOE B). The laryngeal mask has not been evaluated in cases of meconium-stained fluid, during chest compressions, or for administration of emergency intratracheal medications.

Endotracheal Tube Placement

Endotracheal intubation may exist indicated at several points during neonatal resuscitation:

Initial endotracheal suctioning of nonvigorous meconium-stained newborns
If bag-mask ventilation is ineffective or prolonged
When breast compressions are performed
For special resuscitation circumstances, such as built diaphragmatic hernia or extremely low birth weight

The timing of endotracheal intubation may also depend on the skill and experience of the bachelor providers.

Afterwards endotracheal intubation and administration of intermittent positive pressure, a prompt increment in heart rate is the best indicator that the tube is in the tracheobronchial tree and providing effective ventilation.⁵³ Exhaled CO_ii detection is effective for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in infants, including very low-nascency-weight infants (Grade IIa, LOE B^68–71). A positive test result (detection of exhaled CO₂) in patients with adequate cardiac output confirms placement of the endotracheal tube within the trachea, whereas a negative test upshot (ie, no CO₂ detected) strongly suggests esophageal intubation.^68–72 Exhaled CO₂ detection is the recommended method of confirmation of endotracheal tube placement (Class IIa, LOE B). Even so, it should be noted that poor or absent-minded pulmonary claret flow may requite false-negative results (ie, no CO₂ detected despite tube placement in the trachea). A false-negative result may thus lead to unnecessary extubation and reintubation of critically ill infants with poor cardiac output.

Other clinical indicators of correct endotracheal tube placement are condensation in the endotracheal tube, chest move, and presence of equal jiff sounds bilaterally, but these indicators have non been systematically evaluated in neonates (Class 11b, LOE C).

Chest Compressions

Chest compressions are indicated for a center rate that is <60 per minute despite adequate ventilation with supplementary oxygen for 30 seconds. Considering ventilation is the virtually effective action in neonatal resuscitation and because chest compressions are likely to compete with effective ventilation, rescuers should ensure that assisted ventilation is being delivered optimally before starting chest compressions.

Compressions should be delivered on the lower third of the sternum to a depth of approximately i third of the inductive-posterior bore of the breast (Class IIb, LOE C^73–75). 2 techniques have been described: compression with ii thumbs with fingers encircling the chest and supporting the back (the 2 pollex–encircling hands technique) or compression with 2 fingers with a 2nd hand supporting the back. Because the 2 thumb–encircling hands technique may generate higher peak systolic and coronary perfusion pressure than the 2-finger technique,^76–lxxx the 2 thumb–encircling easily technique is recommended for performing chest compressions in newly built-in infants (Class IIb, LOE C). The 2-finger technique may be preferable when access to the umbilicus is required during insertion of an umbilical catheter, although it is possible to administer the 2 thumb–encircling hands technique in intubated infants with the rescuer standing at the baby's head, thus permitting acceptable access to the bellybutton (Form IIb, LOE C).

Compressions and ventilations should be coordinated to avert simultaneous delivery.⁸¹ The chest should be permitted to reexpand fully during relaxation, but the rescuer'due south thumbs should not leave the chest (Class IIb, LOE C). At that place should be a three:1 ratio of compressions to ventilations with 90 compressions and 30 breaths to attain approximately 120 events per infinitesimal to maximize ventilation at an doable rate. Thus each event will be allotted approximately i/2 second, with exhalation occurring during the first compression afterwards each ventilation (Class IIb, LOE C).

There is evidence from animals and non-neonatal studies that sustained compressions or a compression ratio of 15:2 or even 30:2 may be more effective when the arrest is of primary cardiac etiology. Ane study in children suggests that CPR with rescue breathing is preferable to breast compressions alone when the arrest is of noncardiac etiology.⁸² Information technology is recommended that a iii:1 compression to ventilation ratio be used for neonatal resuscitation where compromise of ventilation is nearly always the chief crusade, simply rescuers should consider using college ratios (eg, 15:ii) if the arrest is believed to be of cardiac origin (Class IIb, LOE C).

Respirations, heart charge per unit, and oxygenation should be reassessed periodically, and coordinated chest compressions and ventilations should continue until the spontaneous heart rate is ≥60 per minute (Course IIb, LOE C). However, frequent interruptions of compressions should be avoided, equally they will compromise artificial maintenance of systemic perfusion and maintenance of coronary claret menstruum (Class IIb, LOE C).

Medications

Drugs are rarely indicated in resuscitation of the newly born infant. Bradycardia in the newborn infant is unremarkably the effect of inadequate lung inflation or profound hypoxemia, and establishing adequate ventilation is the nigh important footstep toward correcting it. However, if the heart rate remains <60 per minute despite adequate ventilation (usually with endotracheal intubation) with 100% oxygen and chest compressions, administration of epinephrine or volume expansion, or both, may be indicated. Rarely, buffers, a narcotic antagonist, or vasopressors may be useful after resuscitation, merely these are non recommended in the commitment room.

Rate and Dose of Epinephrine Administration

Epinephrine is recommended to be administered intravenously (Class IIb, LOE C). Past guidelines recommended that initial doses of epinephrine be given through an endotracheal tube because the dose tin can be administered more than quickly than when an intravenous route must be established. Nevertheless, animal studies that showed a positive outcome of endotracheal epinephrine used considerably higher doses than are currently recommended,^83,84 and the one animate being study that used currently recommended doses via endotracheal tube showed no issue.⁸⁵ Given the lack of supportive information for endotracheal epinephrine, the IV route should be used equally soon equally venous access is established (Class IIb, LOE C).

The recommended IV dose is 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg per dose. Higher Iv doses are non recommended considering animal^86,87 and pediatric^88,89 studies show exaggerated hypertension, decreased myocardial part, and worse neurological office after administration of 4 doses in the range of 0.i mg/kg. If the endotracheal route is used, doses of 0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg volition likely be ineffective. Therefore, Iv assistants of 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg per dose is the preferred road. While access is beingness obtained, administration of a higher dose (0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg) through the endotracheal tube may exist considered, but the safety and efficacy of this practice accept not been evaluated (Class IIb, LOE C). The concentration of epinephrine for either road should be 1:10,000 (0.ane mg/mL).

Volume Expansion

Book expansion should be considered when blood loss is known or suspected (stake skin, poor perfusion, weak pulse) and the baby'south centre rate has non responded adequately to other resuscitative measures (Form IIb, LOE C).⁹⁰ An isotonic crystalloid solution or blood is recommended for book expansion in the commitment room (Form IIb, LOE C). The recommended dose is 10 mL/kg, which may need to be repeated. When resuscitating premature infants, care should be taken to avoid giving volume expanders rapidly, because rapid infusions of big volumes accept been associated with intraventricular hemorrhage (Grade IIb, LOE C).

Postresuscitation Care

Babies who require resuscitation are at gamble for deterioration later on their vital signs accept returned to normal. In one case adequate ventilation and circulation have been established, the infant should be maintained in, or transferred to an environment where close monitoring and anticipatory intendance tin can exist provided.

Naloxone

Administration of naloxone is non recommended equally part of initial resuscitative efforts in the delivery room for newborns with respiratory depression. Center rate and oxygenation should exist restored by supporting ventilation.

Glucose

Newborns with lower claret glucose levels are at increased take a chance for brain injury and adverse outcomes subsequently a hypoxic-ischemic insult, although no specific glucose level associated with worse consequence has been identified.^91,92 Increased glucose levels after hypoxia or ischemia were non associated with adverse furnishings in a contempo pediatric series⁹³ or in animate being studies,⁹⁴ and they may be protective.⁹⁵ However, there are no randomized controlled trials that examine this question. Due to the paucity of information, no specific target glucose concentration range can exist identified at nowadays. Intravenous glucose infusion should exist considered as soon as applied after resuscitation, with the goal of avoiding hypoglycemia (Class IIb, LOE C).

Induced Therapeutic Hypothermia

Several randomized controlled multicenter trials of induced hypothermia (33.five°C to 34.5°C) of newborns ≥36 weeks gestational age, with moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy equally defined by strict criteria, showed that those babies who were cooled had significantly lower mortality and less neurodevelopmental inability at eighteen-month follow-up than babies who were not cooled.^96–98 The randomized trials produced similar results using dissimilar methods of cooling (selective caput versus systemic).^96–100 It is recommended that infants born at ≥36 weeks gestation with evolving moderate to severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy should be offered therapeutic hypothermia. The treatment should be implemented according to the studied protocols, which currently include showtime within vi hours post-obit birth, continuation for 72 hours, and dull rewarming over at least four hours. Therapeutic hypothermia should be administered nether clearly defined protocols like to those used in published clinical trials and in facilities with the capabilities for multidisciplinary care and longitudinal follow-up (Class IIa, LOE A). Studies suggest that in that location may be some associated adverse effects, such equally thrombocytopenia and increased need for inotropic back up.

Guidelines for Withholding and Discontinuing Resuscitation

For neonates at the margins of viability or those with weather condition which predict a high gamble of bloodshed or morbidity, attitudes and exercise vary co-ordinate to region and availability of resources. Studies indicate that parents want a larger role in decisions to initiate resuscitation and continue life back up of severely compromised newborns. Opinions among neonatal providers vary widely regarding the benefits and disadvantages of aggressive therapies in such newborns.

Withholding Resuscitation

It is possible to identify weather condition associated with loftier mortality and poor result in which withholding resuscitative efforts may be considered reasonable, particularly when at that place has been the opportunity for parental understanding (Class IIb, LOE C^101,102).

A consistent and coordinated approach to private cases by the obstetric and neonatal teams and the parents is an important goal. Noninitiation of resuscitation and discontinuation of life-sustaining treatment during or afterward resuscitation are ethically equivalent, and clinicians should not hesitate to withdraw support when functional survival is highly unlikely.¹⁰³ The following guidelines must be interpreted according to current regional outcomes:

When gestation, nativity weight, or built anomalies are associated with almost certain early death and when unacceptably high morbidity is probable among the rare survivors, resuscitation is not indicated. Examples include extreme prematurity (gestational historic period <23 weeks or nascency weight <400 yard), anencephaly, and some major chromosomal abnormalities, such as trisomy xiii (Class IIb, LOE C).
In conditions associated with a high charge per unit of survival and adequate morbidity, resuscitation is nearly e'er indicated. This will generally include babies with gestational historic period ≥25 weeks and those with most congenital malformations (Class IIb, LOE C).
In conditions associated with uncertain prognosis in which survival is borderline, the morbidity rate is relatively loftier, and the anticipated brunt to the child is high, parental desires apropos initiation of resuscitation should exist supported (Grade IIb, LOE C).

Cess of morbidity and mortality risks should take into consideration bachelor data, and may be augmented by use of published tools based on data from specific populations. Decisions should besides take into business relationship changes in medical exercise that may occur over time.

Mortality and morbidity information by gestational age compiled from data nerveless by perinatal centers in the US and several other countries may be institute on the Neonatal Resuscitation Programme (NRP) website (www.aap.org/nrp). A link to a computerized tool to approximate mortality and morbidity from a population of extremely low-birth-weight babies born in a network of regional perinatal centers may be plant at that site. However, unless conception occurred via in vitro fertilization, techniques used for obstetric dating are accurate to only ±3 to 4 days if applied in the showtime trimester and to only ±one to 2 weeks later. Estimates of fetal weight are accurate to only ±15% to twenty%. Even small discrepancies of ane or 2 weeks between estimated and bodily gestational age or a 100- to 200-g difference in birth weight may accept implications for survival and long-term morbidity. Too, fetal weight can be misleading if there has been intrauterine growth restriction, and outcomes may be less predictable. These uncertainties underscore the importance of not making firm commitments about withholding or providing resuscitation until you take the opportunity to examine the baby after birth.

Discontinuing Resuscitative Efforts

In a newly born infant with no detectable centre rate, it is appropriate to consider stopping resuscitation if the centre rate remains undetectable for ten minutes (Class IIb, LOE C^104–106). The decision to continue resuscitation efforts beyond x minutes with no heart charge per unit should take into consideration factors such every bit the presumed etiology of the arrest, the gestation of the infant, the presence or absenteeism of complications, the potential office of therapeutic hypothermia, and the parents' previously expressed feelings about acceptable gamble of morbidity.

Structure of Educational Programs to Teach Neonatal Resuscitation

Studies accept demonstrated that use of simulation-based learning methodologies enhances performance in both real-life clinical situations and imitation resuscitations,^107–110 although a few studies have plant no differences when compared to standard or other nonsimulated training.^111,112 Also, studies examining briefings or debriefings of resuscitation team performance have mostly shown improved knowledge or skills.^113–118 Interpretation of data is complicated by the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies, including a paucity of information about clinical outcomes. Based on available testify, information technology is recommended that the AAP/AHA Neonatal Resuscitation Program adopt simulation, briefing, and debriefing techniques in designing an pedagogy program for the acquisition and maintenance of the skills necessary for effective neonatal resuscitation (Class IIb, LOE C).

Disclosures

**Guidelines Function 15: Neonatal Resuscitation Writing Group Disclosures**
Writing Group Member	Employment	Research Grant	Other Research Back up	Speakers' Bureau/ Honoraria	Buying Interest	Consultant/ Advisory Board	Other
John Kattwinkel	University of Virginia–Professor of Pediatrics	None	None	None	None	None	None
Jeffrey M. Perlman	Weill Cornell-Professor of Pediatrics	†NIH-NIH- Improving antimicrobial prescribing practices in the NICU	None	None	None	None	None
Khalid Aziz	Academy of Alberta– Associate Professor of Pediatrics	None	None	None	None	None	None
Christopher Colby	Mayo Clinic–md	None	None	None	None	None	None
Karen Fairchild	Academy of Virginia Health Organization–Acquaintance Professor of Pediatrics	None	None	None	None	None	None
John Gallagher	Univ. Hosp of Cleveland-Crit Care Coordinator of Ped.Resp Care	None	None	None	None	None	None
Mary Fran Hazinski	Vanderbilt Academy School of Nursing—Professor; AHA ECC Product Development-Senior Scientific discipline Editor †Meaning AHA compensation to write, edit and review documents such as the 2010 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC.	None	None	None	None	None	None
Louis P. Halamek	Stanford Academy–Associate Professor	†Laerdal Foundation: The Laerdal Foundation (not company) provided a grant to the Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education at Packard Children'southward Hospital at Stanford during the bookish years 2006–07, 2007–08, 2008–09; I develop simulation-based training programs and carry enquiry at CAPE. This support was provided directly to my institution.	None	*I take received < ten honoraria in amounts of $500 or less from speaking at various academic meetings in the past 24 months; none of these meetings were conducted by for-profit entities.	None	*Laerdal Medical Advanced Medical Simulation Both of these companies reimburse me directly.	*I provide medical consultation to the legal profession for which I am reimbursed directly.
Praveen Kumar	PEDIATRIC FACULTY FOUNDATION-Attention NEONATOLOGIST	None	None	None	None	None	None
George Little	Dartmouth Higher- Ped. Professor; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medfont. Centre Neonatologist	None	None	None	None	None	None
Jane E. McGowan	St Christopher'due south Pediatric Associate/Tenet Healthcare–Attention neonatologist; medical managing director, NICU	None	None	None	None	None	* reviewed records of cases involving neonatal resuscitation on one or ii occasions over the past v years. *As co-editor for Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation sixth edition, to be published by the AAP, being paid a total of $4000 over 3 years by the AAP.
Barbara Nightengale	Univ.Health Assoc,Nurse Practitioner	None	None	None	None	None	None
Mildred K. Ramirez	Univ of Texas Med Schoolhouse Houston-Doctor	None	None	*Signed as consultant for Cytokine Pharmasciences, Inc., for a lecture in United mexican states City. Product Propress for cervical rippening. $ii,000 Coin to Univ.	None	None	*Proficient for Current skillful instance of triplets and preterm delivery. Money to the university &lquote;09
Steven Ringer	Brigham and Women's Hospital–Chief, Newborn Medicine	None	None	*Vermont Oxford Neonatal Network, $one thousand, comes to me	None	*Alere $2000, consultation Dey Pharamaceutical $1000 Consultation Forrest Pharmaceuticals $1500 Grant Review Committee	†Several Attorneys, serving as expert witness in Medical malpractice cases
Wendy Thousand. Simon	American Academy of Pediatrics–Director, Life Support Programs	None	None	None	None	None	None
Gary M. Weiner	St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor Michigan–Attending Neonatologist	None	†Received equipment on-loan (three resuscitation mannequins, 2 sets of video recording equipment) from Laerdal Medical Corporation to be used to consummate a inquiry project evaluating educational methods for teaching neonatal resuscitation. The value of the on-loan equipment is approximately $35,000.	None	None	None	None
Myra Wyckoff	UT Southwestern Medical Middle–Associate Professor of Pediatrics	†American Academy of Pediatrics Neonatal Research Grant-Ergonomics of Neonatal CPR 2008–2009	†Received a SimNewB neonatal simulator for aid in Beta testing prior to terminal product	*Speaker at Symposia on Neonatal Care from University of Miami-honoraria paid to me Speaker at Symposia on Neonatal Care from Columbia/Cornell-honoraria paid directly to me Speaker for Yard Rounds from University of Oklahoma-honoraria paid directly to me	None	None	None
Jeanette Zaichkin	Seattle Children's Infirmary–Neonatal Outreach Coordinator	None	None	*I receive honoraria directly to me from the AAP equally compensation for editorial activities for NRP teacher ms.	None	None	None

Footnotes

The American Heart Clan requests that this document exist cited as follows: Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz Grand, Colby C, Fairchild G, Gallagher J, Hazinski MF, Halamek LP, Kumar P, Little Thousand, McGowan JE, Nightengale B, Ramirez MM, Ringer S, Simon WM, Weiner GM, Wyckoff M, Zaichkin J. Function 15: neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Middle Clan Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(suppl 3):S909–S919.

*Co-chairs and equal kickoff co-authors.

References

i. 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Intendance Science with Treatment Recommendations. Apportionment . In Press.Google Scholar
2. Perlman JM, Risser R. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room: associated clinical events. Curvation Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995; 149:20–25.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
iii. Hairdresser CA, Wyckoff MH. Use and efficacy of endotracheal versus intravenous epinephrine during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room. Pediatrics . 2006; 118:1028–1034.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
iv. Owen CJ, Wyllie JP. Conclusion of middle rate in the infant at birth. Resuscitation . 2004; 60:213–217.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
v. Kamlin CO, Dawson JA, O'Donnell CP, Morley CJ, Donath SM, Sekhon J, Davis PG. Accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement of heart rate of newborn infants in the commitment room. J Pediatr . 2008; 152:756–760.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
6. Am Academy of Pediatrics, Am Higher of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. In: Lockwood C, Lemons J eds. Guidelines for Perinatal Intendance . 6th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: Am University of Pediatrics;2007:205.Google Scholar
7. Annibale DJ, Hulsey TC, Wagner CL, Southgate WM. Comparative neonatal morbidity of abdominal and vaginal deliveries after elementary pregnancies. Curvation Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995; 149:862–867.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Atherton N, Parsons SJ, Mansfield P. Attendance of paediatricians at elective Caesarean sections performed under regional anaesthesia: is it warranted? J Paediatr Child Health . 2006; 42:332–336.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Gordon A, McKechnie EJ, Jeffery H. Pediatric presence at cesarean section: justified or not? Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2005; 193(3 Pt ane):599–605.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Parsons SJ, Sonneveld S, Nolan T. Is a paediatrician needed at all Caesarean sections? J Paediatr Kid Health . 1998; 34:241–244.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
xi. Kattwinkel J ed. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation . 6th ed. Elk Grove Hamlet: Am Academy of Pediatrics; In Press.Google Scholar
12. Cramer K, Wiebe N, Hartling Fifty, Crumley East, Vohra S. Estrus loss prevention: a systematic review of occlusive peel wrap for premature neonates. J Perinatol . 2005; 25:763–769.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
13. Kent AL, Williams J. Increasing ambient operating theatre temperature and wrapping in polyethylene improves access temperature in premature infants. J Paediatr Child Health . 2008; 44:325–331.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
fourteen. Vohra South, Frent Yard, Campbell V, Abbott M, Whyte R. Effect of polyethylene occlusive skin wrapping on estrus loss in very low nascence weight infants at delivery: a randomized trial. J Pediatr . 1999; 134:547–551.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
xv. Vohra S, Roberts RS, Zhang B, Janes Thou, Schmidt B. Estrus Loss Prevention (HeLP) in the commitment room: A randomized controlled trial of polyethylene occlusive peel wrapping in very preterm infants. J Pediatr . 2004; 145:750–753.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
16. Singh A, Duckett J, Newton T, Watkinson Grand. Improving neonatal unit access temperatures in preterm babies: exothermic mattresses, polythene numberless or a traditional approach? J Perinatol . 2010; thirty:45–49.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
17. Meyer MP, Bold GT. Admission temperatures following radiant warmer or incubator transport for preterm infants h28 weeks: a randomised study. Arch Dis Kid Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2007; 92:F295–F297.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
eighteen. Petrova A, Demissie 1000, Rhoads GG, Smulian JC, Marcella S, Ananth CV. Association of maternal fever during labor with neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol . 2001; 98:20–27.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
nineteen. Lieberman E, Lang J, Richardson DK, Frigoletto FD, Heffner LJ, Cohen A. Intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal consequence. Pediatrics . 2000; 105(one Pt ane):8–13.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
20. Coimbra C, Boris-Moller F, Drake M, Wieloch T. Diminished neuronal damage in the rat encephalon past late treatment with the antipyretic drug dipyrone or cooling following cerebral ischemia. Acta Neuropathol . 1996; 92:447–453.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
21. Gungor S, Kurt Eastward, Teksoz Due east, Goktolga U, Ceyhan T, Baser I. Oronasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in normal and term infants delivered by elective cesarean department: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest . 2006; 61:nine–14.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
22. Waltman PA, Brewer JM, Rogers BP, May WL. Building evidence for practice: a pilot written report of newborn bulb suctioning at nascence. J Midwifery Womens Health . 2004; 49:32–38.MedlineGoogle Scholar
23. Perlman JM, Volpe JJ. Suctioning in the preterm baby: effects on cognitive claret flow velocity, intracranial pressure, and arterial claret pressure. Pediatrics . 1983; 72:329–334.MedlineGoogle Scholar
24. Simbruner G, Coradello H, Fodor M, Havelec L, Lubec One thousand, Pollak A. Effect of tracheal suction on oxygenation, circulation, and lung mechanics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Kid . 1981; 56:326–330.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
25. Prendiville A, Thomson A, Silverman M. Result of tracheobronchial suction on respiratory resistance in intubated preterm babies. Curvation Dis Child . 1986; 61:1178–1183.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
26. Vain NE, Szyld EG, Prudent LM, Wiswell TE, Aguilar AM, Vivas NI. Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained neonates earlier delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet . 2004; 364:597–602.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
27. Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, Goldsmith L, Szyld East, Weiss K, Schutzman D, Cleary GM, Filipov P, Kurlat I, Caballero CL, Abassi S, Sprague D, Oltorf C, Padula One thousand. Delivery room direction of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter, international collaborative trial. Pediatrics . 2000; 105(1 Pt ane):1–7.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
28. Rossi EM, Philipson EH, Williams TG, Kalhan SC. Meconium aspiration syndrome: intrapartum and neonatal attributes. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1989; 161:1106–1110.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
29. Usta IM, Mercer BM, Sibai BM. Run a risk factors for meconium aspiration syndrome. Obstet Gynecol . 1995; 86:230–234.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
30. Gupta V, Bhatia BD, Mishra OP. Meconium stained amniotic fluid: antenatal, intrapartum and neonatal attributes. Indian Pediatr . 1996; 33:293–297.MedlineGoogle Scholar
31. Al Takroni AM, Parvathi CK, Mendis KB, Hassan S, Reddy I, Kudair HA. Selective tracheal suctioning to foreclose meconium aspiration syndrome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 1998; 63:259–263.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
32. Carson BS, Losey RW, Bowes WA, Simmons MA. Combined obstetric and pediatric arroyo to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1976; 126:712–715.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
33. Ting P, Brady JP. Tracheal suction in meconium aspiration. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1975; 122:767–771.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
34. Gregory GA, Gooding CA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH. Meconium aspiration in infants–a prospective study. J Pediatr . 1974; 85:848–852.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
35. Toth B, Becker A, Seelbach-Gobel B. Oxygen saturation in healthy newborn infants immediately after nascency measured by pulse oximetry. Arch Gynecol Obstet . 2002; 266:105–107.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
36. Gonzales GF, Salirrosas A. Arterial oxygen saturation in good for you newborns delivered at term in Cerro de Pasco (4340 thousand) and Lima (150 chiliad). Reprod Biol Endocrinol . 2005; 3:46.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
37. Altuncu Eastward, Ozek East, Bilgen H, Topuzoglu A, Kavuncuoglu S. Percentiles of oxygen saturations in healthy term newborns in the offset minutes of life. Eur J Pediatr . 2008; 167:687–688.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
38. Kamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Oxygen saturation in healthy infants immediately after birth. J Pediatr . 2006; 148:585–589.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
39. Mariani G, Dik Lead, Ezquer A, Aguirre A, Esteban ML, Perez C, Fernandez Jonusas S, Fustinana C. Pre-ductal and mail service-ductal O2 saturation in healthy term neonates after birth. J Pediatr . 2007; 150:418–421.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
40. Rabi Y, Yee W, Chen SY, Singhal N. Oxygen saturation trends immediately after birth. J Pediatr . 2006; 148:590–594.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
41. Hay WW, Rodden DJ, Collins SM, Melara DL, Hale KA, Fashaw LM. Reliability of conventional and new pulse oximetry in neonatal patients. J Perinatol . 2002; 22:360–366.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
42. O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Feasibility of and delay in obtaining pulse oximetry during neonatal resuscitation. J Pediatr . 2005; 147:698–699.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
43. Dawson JA, Kamlin CO, Wong C, te Pas AB, O'Donnell CP, Donath SM, Davis PG, Morley CJ. Oxygen saturation and center rate during commitment room resuscitation of infants h30 weeks' gestation with air or 100% oxygen. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2009; 94:F87–F91.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
44. Davis PG, Tan A, O'Donnell CP, Schulze A. Resuscitation of newborn infants with 100% oxygen or air: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet . 2004; 364:1329–1333.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
45. Rabi Y, Rabi D, Yee W. Room air resuscitation of the depressed newborn: a systematic review and meta-assay. Resuscitation . 2007; 72:353–363.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
46. Escrig R, Arruza L, Izquierdo I, Villar G, Saenz P, Gimeno A, Moro M, Vento M. Achievement of targeted saturation values in extremely low gestational historic period neonates resuscitated with low or loftier oxygen concentrations: a prospective, randomized trial. Pediatrics . 2008; 121:875–881.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
47. Karlberg P, Koch G. Respiratory studies in newborn infants. III. Development of mechanics of breathing during the offset week of life. A longitudinal study. Acta Paediatr . 1962;(Suppl 135):121–129.Google Scholar
48. Vyas H, Milner Advertizement, Hopkin IE, Benefaction AW. Physiologic responses to prolonged and deadening-rise inflation in the resuscitation of the asphyxiated newborn infant. J Pediatr . 1981; 99:635–639.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
49. Vyas H, Field D, Milner AD, Hopkin IE. Determinants of the first inspiratory book and functional residue capacity at nascence. Pediatr Pulmonol . 1986; 2:189–193.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
50. Boon AW, Milner Advertisement, Hopkin IE. Lung expansion, tidal exchange, and formation of the functional residual capacity during resuscitation of asphyxiated neonates. J Pediatr . 1979; 95:1031–1036.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
51. Hillman NH, Moss TJ, Kallapur SG, Bachurski C, Pillow JJ, Polglase GR, Nitsos I, Kramer BW, Jobe AH. Brief, large tidal volume ventilation initiates lung injury and a systemic response in fetal sheep. Am J Respir Crit Intendance Med . 2007; 176:575–581.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
52. Polglase GR, Hooper SB, Gill AW, Allison BJ, McLean CJ, Nitsos I, Pillow JJ, Kluckow Chiliad. Cardiovascular and pulmonary consequences of airway recruitment in preterm lambs. J Appl Physiol . 2009; 106:1347–1355.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
53. Dawes GS. Foetal and Neonatal Physiology. A Comparative Study of the Changes at Birth. Chicago: Twelvemonth Volume Medical Publishers, Inc; 1968.Google Scholar
54. Lindner Due west, Vossbeck S, Hummler H, Pohlandt F. Delivery room management of extremely low birth weight infants: spontaneous breathing or intubation? Pediatrics . 1999; 103(5 Pt 1):961–967.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
55. Leone TA, Lange A, Rich W, Effectively NN. Disposable colorimetric carbon dioxide detector employ every bit an indicator of a patent airway during noninvasive mask ventilation. Pediatrics . 2006; 118:e202–204.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
56. Effectively NN, Rich Westward, Wang C, Leone T. Airway obstruction during mask ventilation of very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics . 2009; 123:865–869.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
57. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet JM, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. Due north Engl J Med . 2008; 358:700–708.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
58. Kelm M, Proquitte H, Schmalisch Thousand, Roehr CC. Reliability of two common PEEP-generating devices used in neonatal resuscitation. Klin Padiatr . 2009; 221:415–418.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
59. Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Stewart MJ, Hussain F, Davis PG. The effect of a PEEP valve on a Laerdal neonatal self-inflating resuscitation bag. J Paediatr Child Health . 46(ane–2):51–56, 2010.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
60. Oddie S, Wyllie J, Scally A. Utilize of self-inflating bags for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation . 2005; 67:109–112.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
61. Hussey SG, Ryan CA, Potato BP. Comparison of 3 transmission ventilation devices using an intubated mannequin. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2004; 89:F490–493.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
62. Finer NN, Rich Westward, Craft A, Henderson C. Comparing of methods of handbag and mask ventilation for neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation . 2001; 49:299–305.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
63. Bennett Southward, Effectively NN, Rich W, Vaucher Y. A comparison of iii neonatal resuscitation devices. Resuscitation . 2005; 67:113–118.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
64. Kattwinkel J, Stewart C, Walsh B, Gurka Grand, Paget-Brown A. Responding to compliance changes in a lung model during manual ventilation: perhaps book, rather than force per unit area, should exist displayed. Pediatrics . 2009; 123:e465–470.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
65. Trevisanuto D, Micaglio M, Pitton Grand, Magarotto M, Piva D, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway: is the management of neonates requiring positive pressure level ventilation at nascency changing? Resuscitation . 2004; 62:151–157.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
66. Gandini D, Brimacombe JR. Neonatal resuscitation with the laryngeal mask airway in normal and low birth weight infants. Anesth Analg . 1999; 89:642–643.MedlineGoogle Scholar
67. Esmail Due north, Saleh M, et al. . Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation for Apgar score improvement in neonatal resuscitation. Egyptian Periodical of Anesthesiology . 2002; xviii:115–121.Google Scholar
68. Hosono S, Inami I, Fujita H, Minato M, Takahashi S, Mugishima H. A role of end-tidal CO monitoring for cess of tracheal intubations in very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation at birth. J Perinat Med . 2009; 37:79–84.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
69. Repetto JE, Donohue P-CP, Baker SF, Kelly 50, Nogee LM. Employ of capnography in the delivery room for assessment of endotracheal tube placement. J Perinatol . 2001; 21:284–287.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
70. Roberts WA, Maniscalco WM, Cohen AR, Litman RS, Chhibber A. The apply of capnography for recognition of esophageal intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Pulmonol . 1995; nineteen:262–268.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
71. Aziz HF, Martin JB, Moore JJ. The pediatric disposable end-tidal carbon dioxide detector role in endotracheal intubation in newborns. J Perinatol . 1999; xix:110–113.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
72. Garey DM, Ward R, Rich West, Heldt G, Leone T, Finer NN. Tidal volume threshold for colorimetric carbon dioxide detectors available for use in neonates. Pediatrics . 2008; 121:e1524–1527.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
73. Orlowski JP. Optimum position for external cardiac pinch in infants and immature children. Ann Emerg Med . 1986; 15:667–673.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
74. Phillips GW, Zideman DA. Relation of baby center to sternum: its significance in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lancet . 1986; 1:1024–1025.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
75. Braga MS, Dominguez TE, Pollock AN, Niles D, Meyer A, Myklebust H, Nysaether J, Nadkarni Five. Estimation of optimal CPR chest pinch depth in children past using computer tomography. Pediatrics . 2009; 124:e69–e74.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
76. Menegazzi JJ, Auble TE, Nicklas KA, Hosack GM, Rack L, Goode JS. Two-thumb versus two-finger chest compression during CRP in a swine infant model of cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med . 1993; 22:240–243.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
77. Houri PK, Frank LR, Menegazzi JJ, Taylor R. A randomized, controlled trial of 2-thumb vs ii-finger chest compression in a swine infant model of cardiac abort. Prehosp Emerg Care . 1997; i:65–67.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
78. Udassi JP, Udassi Southward, Theriaque DW, Shuster JJ, Zaritsky AL, Haque IU. Effect of culling chest compression techniques in infant and kid on rescuer performance. Pediatr Crit Care Med . 2009; 10:328–333.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
79. David R. Airtight chest cardiac massage in the newborn babe. Pediatrics . 1988; 81:552–554.MedlineGoogle Scholar
80. Thaler MM, Stobie GH. An improved technique of external caridac compression in infants and immature children. N Engl J Med . 1963; 269:606–610.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
81. Berkowitz ID, Chantarojanasiri T, Koehler RC, Schleien CL, Dean JM, Michael JR, Rogers MC, Traystman RJ. Claret menstruum during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with simultaneous compression and ventilation in infant pigs. Pediatr Res . 1989; 26:558–564.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
82. Kitamura T, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Nagao K, Tanaka H, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Hiraide A. Conventional and chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study. Lancet . 2010; 375:1347–1354.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
83. Mielke LL, Frank C, Lanzinger MJ, Wilhelm MG, Entholzner EK, Hargasser SR, Hipp RF. Plasma catecholamine levels following tracheal and intravenous epinephrine administration in swine. Resuscitation . 1998; 36:187–192.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
84. Roberts JR, Greenberg MI, Knaub MA, Kendrick ZV, Baskin SI. Blood levels following intravenous and endotracheal epinephrine administration. JACEP . 1979; 8:53–56.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
85. Hornchen U, Schuttler J, Stoeckel H, Eichelkraut Due west, Hahn N. Endobronchial instillation of epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med . 1987; fifteen:1037–1039.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
86. Berg RA, Otto CW, Kern KB, Hilwig RW, Sanders AB, Henry CP, Ewy GA. A randomized, blinded trial of loftier-dose epinephrine versus standard-dose epinephrine in a swine model of pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med . 1996; 24:1695–1700.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
87. Burchfield DJ, Preziosi MP, Lucas VW, Fan J. Effects of graded doses of epinephrine during asphxia-induced bradycardia in newborn lambs. Resuscitation . 1993; 25:235–244.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
88. Perondi MB, Reis AG, Paiva EF, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA. A comparison of high-dose and standard-dose epinephrine in children with cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med . 2004; 350:1722–1730.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
89. Patterson Md, Boenning DA, Klein BL, Fuchs Due south, Smith KM, Hegenbarth MA, Carlson DW, Krug SE, Harris EM. The use of high-dose epinephrine for patients with out-of-infirmary cardiopulmonary arrest refractory to prehospital interventions. Pediatr Emerg Intendance . 2005; 21:227–237.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
xc. Wyckoff MH, Perlman JM, Laptook AR. Employ of book expansion during commitment room resuscitation in most-term and term infants. Pediatrics . 2005; 115:950–955.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
91. Salhab WA, Wyckoff MH, Laptook AR, Perlman JM. Initial hypoglycemia and neonatal brain injury in term infants with severe fetal acidemia. Pediatrics . 2004; 114:361–366.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
92. Ondoa-Onama C, Tumwine JK. Immediate outcome of babies with low Apgar score in Mulago Hospital, Uganda. East Afr Med J . 2003; 80:22–29.MedlineGoogle Scholar
93. Klein GW, Hojsak JM, Schmeidler J, Rapaport R. Hyperglycemia and outcome in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr . 2008; 153:379–384.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
94. LeBlanc MH, Huang K, Patel D, Smith EE, Devidas G. Glucose given later hypoxic ischemia does non affect brain injury in piglets. Stroke . 25:1443–1447, 1994; give-and-take 1448.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
95. Hattori H, Wasterlain CG. Posthypoxic glucose supplement reduces hypoxic-ischemic brain harm in the neonatal rat. Ann Neurol . 1990; 28:122–128.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
96. Gluckman PD, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Ballard R, Edwards AD, Ferriero DM, Polin RA, Robertson CM, Thoresen M, Whitelaw A, Gunn AJ. Selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia afterwards neonatal encephalopathy: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet . 2005; 365:663–670.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
97. Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, Fanaroff AA, Poole WK, Wright LL, Higgins RD, Finer NN, Carlo WA, Duara S, Oh W, Cotten CM, Stevenson DK, Stoll BJ, Lemons JA, Guillet R, Jobe AH. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Northward Engl J Med . 2005; 353:1574–1584.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
98. Azzopardi DV, Strohm B, Edwards AD, Dyet L, Halliday HL, Juszczak Due east, Kapellou O, Levene M, Marlow Due north, Porter E, Thoresen M, Whitelaw A, Brocklehurst P. Moderate hypothermia to treat perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy. N Engl J Med . 2009; 361:1349–1358.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
99. Eicher DJ, Wagner CL, Katikaneni LP, Hulsey TC, Bass WT, Kaufman DA, Horgan MJ, Languani S, Bhatia JJ, Givelichian LM, Sankaran M, Yager JY. Moderate hypothermia in neonatal encephalopathy: safety outcomes. Pediatr Neurol . 2005; 32:18–24.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
100. Lin ZL, Yu HM, Lin J, Chen SQ, Liang ZQ, Zhang ZY. Mild hypothermia via selective head cooling equally neuroprotective therapy in term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: an experience from a single neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol . 2006; 26:180–184.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
101. Field DJ, Dorling JS, Manktelow BN, Draper ES. Survival of extremely premature babies in a geographically defined population: prospective cohort report of 1994–ix compared with 2000–5. BMJ . 2008; 336:1221–1223.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
102. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Light-green C, Higgins RD. Intensive care for extreme prematurity–moving across gestational age. North Engl J Med . 2008; 358:1672–1681.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
103. Paris JJ. What standards employ to resuscitation at the borderline of gestational age? J Perinatol . 2005; 25:683–684.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
104. Jain 50, Ferre C, Vidyasagar D, Nath S, Sheftel D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of plainly stillborn infants: survival and long-term upshot. J Pediatr . 1991; 118:778–782.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
105. Casalaz DM, Marlow N, Speidel BD. Outcome of resuscitation following unexpected apparent stillbirth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 1998; 78:F112–F115.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
106. Laptook AR, Shankaran S, Ambalavanan North, Carlo WA, McDonald SA, Higgins RD, Das A. Consequence of term infants using apgar scores at 10 minutes following hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatrics . 2009; 124:1619–1626.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
107. Knudson MM, Khaw L, Bullard MK, Dicker R, Cohen MJ, Staudenmayer K, Sadjadi J, Howard Due south, Gaba D, Krummel T. Trauma training in simulation: translating skills from SIM time to real time. J Trauma . 64:255–263, 2008; discussion 263–254.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
108. Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest squad responses at an academic teaching hospital: a case-control study. Breast . 2008; 133:56–61.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
109. Kory PD, Eisen LA, Adachi One thousand, Ribaudo VA, Rosenthal ME, Mayo PH. Initial airway management skills of senior residents: simulation training compared with traditional grooming. Chest . 2007; 132:1927–1931.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
110. Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Michalowski P, Ross BK. Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing improves performance in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator. Teach Learn Med . 2001; thirteen:92–96.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
111. Shapiro MJ, Morey JC, Pocket-sized SD, Langford V, Kaylor CJ, Jagminas Fifty, Suner South, Salisbury ML, Simon R, Jay GD. Simulation based teamwork grooming for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team operation when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? Qual Saf Health Care . 2004; xiii:417–421.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
112. Red RA, Williams J, George J, Ali J. The effectiveness of a man patient simulator in the ATLS shock skills station. J Surg Res . 2007; 139:229–235.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
113. Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology . 2006; 105:279–285.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
114. Edelson DP, Litzinger B, Arora V, Walsh D, Kim Due south, Lauderdale DS, Vanden Hoek TL, Becker LB, Abella BS. Improving in-hospital cardiac abort process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med . 2008; 168:1063–1069.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
115. DeVita MA, Schaefer J, Lutz J, Wang H, Dongilli T. Improving medical emergency team (MET) performance using a novel curriculum and a computerized human patient simulator. Qual Saf Health Care . 2005; 14:326–331.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
116. Wayne DB, Butter J, Siddall VJ, Fudala MJ, Linquist LA, Feinglass J, Wade LD, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based preparation of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: a randomized trial. Teach Acquire Med . 2005; 17:210–216.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
117. Clay Equally, Que L, Petrusa ER, Sebastian Chiliad, Govert J. Debriefing in the intensive care unit: a feedback tool to facilitate bedside education. Crit Care Med . 2007; 35:738–754.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
118. Blum RH, Raemer DB, Carroll JS, Dufresne RL, Cooper JB. A method for measuring the effectiveness of simulation-based team training for improving communication skills. Anesth Analg . 2005; 100:1375–1380,.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

combsapping.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circulationaha.110.971119